From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Meletiche v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 1999
260 A.D.2d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 5, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the proceeding is dismissed.

This proceeding, which sought leave to file a late summons and complaint on the City of New York based on a claimed toll for infancy, must be dismissed inasmuch as no cause of action exists for leave to file a late summons and complaint. Even if this defect were not present, we would nevertheless conclude that no toll would apply since the injured infant was represented by her mother as guardian, and by counsel, both of whom were in a position to adequately protect her interests ( see, CPLR 208; Henry v. City of New York, 244 A.D.2d 93; see generally, Hernandez v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 78 N.Y.2d 687).

Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Meletiche v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 1999
260 A.D.2d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Meletiche v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ASHLEY MELETICHE, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 5, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 316

Citing Cases

Strignano v. Jamaica Hospital

The determination in Henry has been adhered to by at least two IAS courts, one in Nassau County on constraint…

Strignano v. Jamaica Hosp.

(Russo v City of New York, supra, 258 NY, at 349.) The determination in Henry (supra) has been adhered to by…