From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McLinn

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 6, 1983
721 F.2d 666 (9th Cir. 1983)

Summary

granting rehearing en banc

Summary of this case from Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Schwab

Opinion

No. 82-3644.

December 6, 1983.

Gerald W. Markham, Kodiak, Alaska, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Kenneth F. Brittain, James M. Powell, Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz Powell, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendants-appellees.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, and CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.


Summaries of

Matter of McLinn

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 6, 1983
721 F.2d 666 (9th Cir. 1983)

granting rehearing en banc

Summary of this case from Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Schwab

granting rehearing en banc

Summary of this case from Doleman v. Meiji Mut. Life Ins. Co.
Case details for

Matter of McLinn

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF WILLIAM McLINN, AS OWNER OF THE F/V…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 6, 1983

Citations

721 F.2d 666 (9th Cir. 1983)

Citing Cases

Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Schwab

This court recently granted rehearing en banc, however, to decide whether a "clearly wrong" or a de novo…

Proud v. United States

This issue need not detain us, however, because we must affirm under either standard. See Churchill v. F/V…