Opinion
Argued January 24, 1898
Decided March 1, 1898
Clarence L. Barber for appellants.
Bache McE. Whitlock and James Punnett for respondents.
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except PARKER, Ch. J., not sitting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
In re the Mayor of New York
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1898
49 N.E. 1100 (N.Y. 1898)
Summaries of
In re the Mayor of New York
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1898
49 N.E. 1100 (N.Y. 1898)
Case details for
In re the Mayor of New York
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Application of THE MAYOR, ETC, OF NEW YORK, Relative…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 1, 1898
Citations
49 N.E. 1100 (N.Y. 1898)
49 N.E. 1100
Citing Cases
Van Winkle v. Van Winkle
This is the general rule. ( Matter of Ladue, 118 N.Y. 213; Matter of Mayor, 20 App. Div. 404; S.C. affd., 155…
Van Winkle v. Van WinkleThe presumption is that a conveyance of land bounded by an existing street or road carries the fee to the…