From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Matey v. Bethlehem Cent. Sch. Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 25, 1978
63 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

May 25, 1978


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered February 18, 1977 in Albany County, which granted petitioner's application for permission to file a late claim against appellant school district. The Court of Appeals has recently given subdivision 5 of section 50-e Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law retroactive effect to the extent of allowing applications to file late within the time limited for the commencement of the action against the public corporation so long as the claim arose after September 1, 1975 (Matter of Beary v City of Rye, 44 N.Y.2d 398). The claim in this case arose in January, 1976 and the motion to file late was made returnable in December of that year. Thus, the motion was properly considered under the provisions of section 50-e, as amended. In view of the fact that appellant had actual notice of the accident and that its agents were present when the accident occurred, we can find no abuse of Special Term's discretion under the statute to grant leave to file a late claim. Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Greenblott, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur. [ 89 Misc.2d 390.]


Summaries of

Matter of Matey v. Bethlehem Cent. Sch. Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 25, 1978
63 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Matter of Matey v. Bethlehem Cent. Sch. Dist

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PAMELA A. MATEY, Respondent, v. BETHLEHEM CENTRAL SCHOOL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 25, 1978

Citations

63 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Ziecker v. Orchard Park

It is undisputed that in the instant case the defendant municipalities not only had notice of plaintiff's…

Whitehead v. Centerville Fire District

When defendant interposed, as an affirmative defense, plaintiffs' failure to comply with section 50-e Gen.…