From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Martindale

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Kings County
Nov 1, 1910
69 Misc. 522 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1910)

Summary

In Matter of Martindale (69 Misc. 522) the will bequeathed capital stock "mentioned in a certain agreement * * * subject to all the terms and provisions of the said agreement."

Summary of this case from Matter of Angle

Opinion

November, 1910.

Dykman, Oeland Kuhn (John J. Kuhn and William W. Taylor, of counsel), for proponent.

Foley Powell (Henry A. Powell, of counsel), for respondent.


The will propounded contains a gift and devise of the entire estate to the testator's wife. It then proceeds as follows:

" Third. It is my will and I hereby direct that the capital stock of the Martindale Agency, mentioned in a certain agreement entered into between George B. Martindale and myself and bearing date the 7th day of January, 1909, of which I may die possessed, shall pass under this will subject to all the terms and provisions of the said agreement."

The question is presented by proper answer whether or not, in the probate and record of the will, shall be included, as a part thereof, the entire agreement referred to in the third paragraph of the will.

It is "unquestionably the law of this state that an unattested paper which is of a testamentary character cannot be taken as a part of the will, even if referred to by that instrument." Booth v. Baptist Church, 126 N.Y. 215, 224.

Whether or not an instrument purely contractual can ever be made a part of a will by reference, there is no intention revealed in this will that the instrument therein mentioned shall be a part thereof.

Even when a testator's meaning is in balance, it is the duty to ascribe normal rather than eccentric purposes. In this case the incorporation of the extrinsic paper would be useless, for it would change nothing. There is no indication that the testator intended to load his will with a mass of words which, if introduced, would not affect the disposition of his estate.

Hence, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, it must be found that he did not harbor an idle and fantastic purpose and that it did not occur to him that a part of his will was the contract in question.

The will should be admitted according to its face.

Decreed accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Martindale

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Kings County
Nov 1, 1910
69 Misc. 522 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1910)

In Matter of Martindale (69 Misc. 522) the will bequeathed capital stock "mentioned in a certain agreement * * * subject to all the terms and provisions of the said agreement."

Summary of this case from Matter of Angle
Case details for

Matter of Martindale

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of BARTON W.S…

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Kings County

Date published: Nov 1, 1910

Citations

69 Misc. 522 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1910)
127 N.Y.S. 887

Citing Cases

Matter of Angle

The latter, of course, was executed according to statute. In Matter of Martindale ( 69 Misc. 522) the will…