From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Markowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 29, 1950
277 AD 38 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion


277 A.D. 38 97 N.Y.S.2d 516 In the Matter of ISRAEL MARKOWITZ, an Attorney, Respondent. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Petitioner. Supreme Court of New York, First Department. May 29, 1950

         DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS instituted by The Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Respondent was admitted to the Bar October 5, 1926, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department.

         COUNSEL

          George G. Hunter, Jr., of counsel (Frank H. Gordon, attorney), for petitioner.

          Israel Markowitz, respondent in person.

          Per Curiam.

          Respondent's many personal and financial misfortunes, however genuine, can hardly serve to excuse the misappropriation of the $1,000 held by him in escrow. He has otherwise borne a good reputation during the twenty-three years since he has been admitted to practice. Weighing the foregoing considerations in mitigation of the discipline which must be imposed, it is determined that respondent should be suspended from practice, with leave to apply for reinstatement after the lapse of six months and upon furnishing satisfactory proof that full restitution of these moneys has been made with interest.

          PECK, P. J., GLENNON, CALLAHAN, VAN VOORHIS and SHIENTAG, JJ., concur.

          Respondent suspended for six months.

Summaries of

Matter of Markowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 29, 1950
277 AD 38 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Matter of Markowitz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ISRAEL MARKOWITZ, an Attorney, Respondent. ASSOCIATION OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 29, 1950

Citations

277 AD 38 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
277 App. Div. 38
97 N.Y.S.2d 516

Citing Cases

Matter of O'Doherty

In such circumstances the quite unfortunate but not extraordinary family difficulties that respondent had…

Matter of Markowitz

The respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Department on October 5, 1926. In prior disciplinary…