From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Marincel v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 20, 1976
359 N.E.2d 1368 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued November 19, 1976

Decided December 20, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

John C. Fish for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Henriette Frieder, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 50 A.D.2d 630).

Concur: Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE. Taking no part: Chief Judge BREITEL.


Summaries of

Matter of Marincel v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 20, 1976
359 N.E.2d 1368 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Marincel v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of CATHERINE MARINCEL, Respondent, v. GOODYEAR…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 20, 1976

Citations

359 N.E.2d 1368 (N.Y. 1976)
359 N.E.2d 1368
391 N.Y.S.2d 574

Citing Cases

Matter of Nizich v. Robert F. Barreca, Inc.

This appeal ensued. Contrary to the employer's contention, an injury caused by emotional trauma resulting…