From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Maresca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 4, 1968
29 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

April 4, 1968


Order entered September 7, 1967, herein appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion for a stay of arbitration granted and a hearing directed on the issues raised by appellant as to whether claimant was in fact involved in a hit-and-run accident and whether claimant exercised due diligence to ascertain the identity of the operator of the other car allegedly involved in said accident. The demand for arbitration did not comply with the statutory requirements and accordingly appellant is not barred from seeking a stay of arbitration (CPLR 7503, subd. [c]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [ Neithardt], 24 A.D.2d 941).

Concur — Botein, P.J., Stevens, Eager, McGivern and Rabin, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Maresca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 4, 1968
29 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Matter of Maresca

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between DENNIS G. MARESCA, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 4, 1968

Citations

29 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Sleepy Hollow Development & Community Improvement Housing Development Fund Co. v. De Angelis

In Matter of Hesslein Co. v Greenfield ( 281 N.Y. 26), it was squarely held that the validity of the time…

Matter of Allstate Ins. Co.

The notice of intention to arbitrate did not contain the 10-day preclusion language, provided for in the…