From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Makris v. Westchester County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 24, 1994
208 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 24, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the infant petitioner's application. The application was made within the appropriate period of limitation, as tolled by the petitioner's infancy (see, Matter of Tomlinson v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 190 A.D.2d 806; Matter of Kurz v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 174 A.D.2d 671). Westchester County and Westchester County Medical Center (hereinafter WCMC) will not be unduly prejudiced by the delay. WCMC is in possession of the infant's medical records, and thus had actual notice of the claim and its underlying facts (see, Matter of Tomlinson v New York City Health Hosps. Corp., supra; Matter of Kurz v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., supra). Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Makris v. Westchester County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 24, 1994
208 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Makris v. Westchester County

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANNA MAKRIS, as Mother and Natural Guardian of ELANA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 24, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 67

Citing Cases

Zachman v. County of Suffolk

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Under the facts and circumstances of…

Rosas v. 397 Broadway Corp.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court…