From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lyden v. United Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 11, 1949
275 App. Div. 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

May 11, 1949.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.

Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Bergan, JJ. [See post, p. 1005.]


The award was for reduced earnings due to disability occasioned by pulmonary tuberculosis as an occupational disease, which, appellants contend, was not competently sustained in fact or in law. Claimant's employment in question was that of a laboratory technician. The evidence is that upon entering it, in 1938, she was free from disease. She has no family history of tuberculosis nor that of contact with persons so afflicted except in the course of her employment wherein such contacts did occur, both as to patients so afflicted as well as in her exposure to cultures of live tubercle bacilli and sputum specimens containing them. Her health became somewhat impaired a few months prior to May, 1946, when X-ray examinations disclosed the tubercular affliction. The evidence and the reasonable inferences it permits, coupled with the applicable presumptions, support the decision and award. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to be divided between the claimant and the Workmen's Compensation Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Lyden v. United Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 11, 1949
275 App. Div. 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Matter of Lyden v. United Hospital

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARGARET LYDEN, Respondent, against UNITED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 11, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Women's Division, Etc. v. Alaska Indus. Bd.

The Court cannot find that this inference is without support in the evidence, from which it follows that…

Matter of Williams v. Buffalo General Hospital

The board was not required to find as appellant contends that decedent merely contributed for her own room…