From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lohmaier v. Ulster Cty. Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 30, 1975
50 A.D.2d 1055 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

December 30, 1975


Cross appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered December 12, 1975 in Ulster County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 330 of the Election Law, granted certain items of relief sought in the petition and denied others and further denied a motion to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. We hold that the motion to dismiss should have been granted. It is not disputed that the victorious candidate in the challenged election herein was not properly served within the 20-day time limit of subdivision 4 of section 330 of the Election Law. Since he was a necessary party to the proceeding, this defect is noncurable, and the petition must be dismissed. (Matter of Ullman v Power, 17 A.D.2d 792, affd 12 N.Y.2d 724; Matter of Suthergreen v Westfall, 6 A.D.2d 1014.) Judgment reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed, without costs. Greenblott, J.P., Sweeney, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Lohmaier v. Ulster Cty. Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 30, 1975
50 A.D.2d 1055 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Matter of Lohmaier v. Ulster Cty. Board

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH LOHMAIER et al., Appellants, v. ULSTER COUNTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 1055 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Underwood v. Silverstein

Other courts have reached the same jurisdictional conclusions in regard to mandatory time periods in election…

Matter of Giglia v. Carlsen

Subdivision 4 of section 330 of the Election Law requires that a proceeding to review determinations…