Summary
distinguishing "provisions ... which specify no particular time limitation for" compliance with a condition precedent from "situations where a right to seek relief is specifically conditioned upon compliance with a particular time requirement rather than, or in addition to, a Statute of Limitations"
Summary of this case from U.S. Bank v. DLJ Mortg. Capital, Inc.Opinion
Decided April 28, 1987
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that it does not lie as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question, and upon the further ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.