From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Liberty Mutual Insur. Co. v. Decaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1997
244 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 17, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of the petition which was for a temporary stay of arbitration. The record indicates that the petitioner-insurance carrier had ample time to seek discovery of the respondent-insured as provided for in the underlying insurance policy, but that it unjustifiably failed to do so in that time ( see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Urena, 208 A.D.2d 623; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Nebedum, 208 A.D.2d 624; cf., Matter of Metropolitan Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Keeney, 241 A.D.2d 455; Matter of MVAIC [Lucash], 16 A.D.2d 975, 976).

Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Liberty Mutual Insur. Co. v. Decaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1997
244 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Liberty Mutual Insur. Co. v. Decaro

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. SERAFINA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 910

Citing Cases

Progressive Speciality Ins. Co. v. to Stay the Arbitration Sought to Be Had By Stephen Alexis

Similarly, Petitioners have had "ample" time to seek such discovery. See, DeSapio v. Kohlmeyer, supra; Matter…

Matter of State Farm Ins. Comp. v. Smith

The record indicates that the petitioner had ample time to seek discovery of the respondent as provided for…