From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Leone v. Yates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1952
280 App. Div. 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

June 23, 1952.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.


Consolidated appeals in a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act and in a companion action. The proceeding, to review a determination of the board of appeals of the incorporated village of Elmsford granting a variance as to the rear yards of three proposed dwelling houses, was instituted by the owners of a dwelling located generally to the rear of the proposed houses. The action is by the petitioners in the proceeding against the applicant for the variances to enjoin him from constructing the proposed dwellings. In the proceeding the appeals are by the petitioners from an order dismissing the proceeding and from an order denying their motion to add the defendant in the action as a party to the proceeding and for an injunction pendente lite. The appeal in the action is from an order denying plaintiffs' motion for an injunction pendente lite. Orders unanimously affirmed, with a single bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.


Summaries of

Matter of Leone v. Yates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1952
280 App. Div. 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Matter of Leone v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH J. LEONE et al., Appellants, against ROBERT YATES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Matter of Village of Bronxville v. Francis

It is argued, however, that this being an "area" variance, unique plight or unique hardship need not be…

MATTER OF VILL. OF BRONXVILLE v. Francis

Here, the question is different. It is argued, however, that this being an "area" variance, unique plight or…