From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Layton v. Spear Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 15, 1941
261 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

January 15, 1941.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.


The claimant was employed as a retail furniture salesman on commission. According to custom and with his employer's permission he left his employer's store at about four P.M., and walked about one block to a tavern where he had some lunch. While returning to the store, shortly after five P.M., he slipped on the ice and fell. The State Industrial Board found that the accident arose out of and in the course of his employment. Award reversed, and claim dismissed, on the authority of Matter of Johnson v. Smith ( 263 N.Y. 10) and Matter of Oram v. Byron G. Moon Co., Inc. ( 260 App. Div. 822). Hill, P.J., and Bliss, J., concur; Crapser, J., concurs, on the authority of Matter of McInerney v. Buffalo Susquehanna R.R. Corp. ( 225 N.Y. 130) and Matter of Clark v. Voorhees (231 id. 14); Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., dissent, on the authority of Matter of Bollard v. Engel ( 254 App. Div. 162; affd., 278 N.Y. 463). [See post, p. 1010.]


Summaries of

Matter of Layton v. Spear Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 15, 1941
261 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Matter of Layton v. Spear Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of GEORGE S. LAYTON, SR., Respondent, against…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1941

Citations

261 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Citing Cases

Matter of Purcell v. Hearn's Dept. Store

The respondent board relies largely on Matter of Bollard v. Engel ( 254 App. Div. 162, affd. 278 N.Y. 463),…

Halstead v. Johnson's Texaco

Claimant asks us to recognize an exception which some courts have applied to coffee breaks, rest breaks, and…