From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lawrence v. Headley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 1999
257 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

January 14, 1999.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination finding him guilty of harassment and two counts of creating a disturbance as charged in two misbehavior reports. As related by the first misbehavior report, petitioner played his radio in a loud manner without using his headphones; the second misbehavior report alleged that petitioner yelled a remark, using obscene language, after observing a correction officer writing misbehavior reports. Notwithstanding petitioner's contention to the contrary, the detailed misbehavior reports and corroborating testimony presented at the hearing provided substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's misconduct ( see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966). Any alleged inconsistencies in the testimony presented a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see, Matter of Campbell v. Goord, 254 A.D.2d 590, 590-591). While petitioner alleged that the misbehavior reports were written in retaliation for the grievance he had filed against the correction officer, the Hearing Officer, resolving an issue of credibility ( see, Matter of Moncrieffe v. Bennett, 251 A.D.2d 925), noted that the lapse of time between the grievance and the issuance of the misbehavior reports made any such claim unlikely. Furthermore, we find petitioner's contention of Hearing Officer bias to be unavailing. The fact that the Hearing Officer resolved issues of credibility against petitioner and may have made various brusque comments to petitioner during the hearing is not indicative of bias ( see, Matter of Spencer v. Goord, 245 A.D.2d 827, 828, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 811; Matter of Barnhill v. Coombe, 239 A.D.2d 719, 721). In any event, petitioner failed to establish that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias ( see, id.). To the extent that petitioner's remaining contentions are preserved for our review, we find them to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Lawrence v. Headley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 1999
257 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Lawrence v. Headley

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. LAWRENCE, Petitioner, v. FRANK HEADLEY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1999

Citations

257 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 118

Citing Cases

People v. Guaman

Recusal, generally a matter of conscience and personal to the judge before whom the proceeding is pending, is…

Pride v. Cunningham

The detailed misbehavior report and the corroborating testimony of the reporting officer were sufficient to…