From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lawrence v. Edwards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1999
261 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 3, 1999

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Superintendent of the Otisville Correctional Facility dated February 29, 1997, which confirmed a decision of a Hearing Officer, made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty, inter alia, of refusing to follow a direct order, and imposed a penalty.


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report provided substantial evidence to support the determination finding him guilty of refusing to follow a direct order and making a false statement ( see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964; People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130). To the extent that the petitioner and the inmate witnesses disputed the statements of the correction officers in the misbehavior report, this presented an issue of credibility which was in the Hearing Officer's discretion to resolve ( see, Matter of Perez v. Wilmot, 67 N.Y.2d 615, 617; Matter of Vargas v. Strack, 220 A.D.2d 675).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

S. Miller, J. P., O'Brien, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Lawrence v. Edwards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1999
261 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Lawrence v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT A. LAWRENCE, Petitioner, v. ERNEST EDWARDS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
690 N.Y.S.2d 69

Citing Cases

Vaughn v. Orlando

"A prison disciplinary determination made as a result of a hearing at which evidence was taken pursuant to…

Truss v. Westchester Cty. Health Care

omply with a call-in policy constituted misconduct or incompetence was based on substantial evidence (see…