From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Laubeck v. Toc's Products Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1941
35 N.E.2d 927 (N.Y. 1941)

Opinion

Submitted May 20, 1941

Decided June 12, 1941

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Herbert F. Hastings, Jr., and F.G. Mann for appellants.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( John F. Loehr of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ. LEHMAN, Ch. J., and LOUGHRAN, J., dissent on the ground that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of claimant's employment.


Summaries of

Claim of Laubeck v. Toc's Products Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1941
35 N.E.2d 927 (N.Y. 1941)
Case details for

Claim of Laubeck v. Toc's Products Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JANE LAUBECK, Respondent, against TOC'S…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 12, 1941

Citations

35 N.E.2d 927 (N.Y. 1941)
35 N.E.2d 927

Citing Cases

Matter of Davis v. Newsweek Magazine

tween the employment and the injury, then one may say that in the ordinary effort of living a man continually…

In re Margaret Fischer

The festival was not a significant departure from claimant's route to her next appointment and, while the gap…