Opinion
June 16, 1998
Respondent's decision is supported by substantial evidence, including properly received hearsay (see, Matter of Williams v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 225 A.D.2d 490, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 810). In light of the circumstance that there was substantial evidence that the complainant was unavailable to testify, we find no due process violation in the admission of the parole officer's testimony as to what she had said (compare, People ex rel. McGee v. Walters, 62 N.Y.2d 317, 323).
Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.