From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Langton v. Rutkoske

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1998
252 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

July 6, 1998


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Following a hearing, the respondent Town of Islip Housing Authority determined that the petitioner committed two violations of 24 C.F.R. § 982.551 (b) (2) in that she misrepresented her family composition and misrepresented her income. Based upon our review of the record, we find the respondents' determination to be supported by substantial evidence ( see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 179). Thus, the determination must be sustained, regardless of whether a similar quantum of evidence is available to support a varying conclusion ( see, Matter of Collins v. Codd, 38 N.Y.2d 269, 270).

We have considered the petitioner's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Copertino, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Langton v. Rutkoske

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1998
252 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Langton v. Rutkoske

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EVA LANGTON, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM E. RUTKOSKE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1998

Citations

252 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
676 N.Y.S.2d 494

Citing Cases

Gist v. Mulligan

The petitioner maintains that the determination was not supported by substantial evidence and that the…

Steward v. Mulligan

Substantial evidence "means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a…