From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Krieger v. Krauskopf, Perales

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1987
512 N.E.2d 540 (N.Y. 1987)

Summary

In Krieger (70 N.Y.2d 637, affg 121 A.D.2d 448), the Court of Appeals affirmed a ruling by the Appellate Division that there was no legally valid basis for DSS's position that an eligible individual cannot be directly reimbursed for medical payments made during the three-month preapplication period, but that payments could only be made to providers of the services rendered.

Summary of this case from Seittelman v. Sabol

Opinion

Argued May 29, 1987

Decided June 30, 1987

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, William T. Bellard, J.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Maryellen Weinberg, O. Peter Sherwood and Lawrence S. Kahn of counsel), for appellant. Lester Helfman, Joan Mangones, John E. Kirklin and Nancy Morawetz for Mildred Krieger, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 121 A.D.2d 448).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Matter of Krieger v. Krauskopf, Perales

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1987
512 N.E.2d 540 (N.Y. 1987)

In Krieger (70 N.Y.2d 637, affg 121 A.D.2d 448), the Court of Appeals affirmed a ruling by the Appellate Division that there was no legally valid basis for DSS's position that an eligible individual cannot be directly reimbursed for medical payments made during the three-month preapplication period, but that payments could only be made to providers of the services rendered.

Summary of this case from Seittelman v. Sabol
Case details for

Matter of Krieger v. Krauskopf, Perales

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MILDRED KRIEGER, Respondent, v. JAMES A. KRAUSKOPF, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 30, 1987

Citations

512 N.E.2d 540 (N.Y. 1987)
512 N.E.2d 540
518 N.Y.S.2d 957

Citing Cases

Seittelman v. Sabol

Proposed plaintiff-intervenors Leah Silverman and Nancy Levanoni, as attorney-in-fact for Sadye Bass, seek to…

Seittelman v. Sabol

Consequently, 18 NYCRR 360-7.5(a)(5) is null and void to the extent that it limits reimbursement for expenses…