From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Koeber v. Bedell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1939
21 N.E.2d 200 (N.Y. 1939)

Summary

upholding prohibition of reconstruction of nonconforming building after fire damaged it by more than seventy-five percent of its value

Summary of this case from Chioffi v. City of Winooski

Opinion

Argued April 3, 1939

Decided April 18, 1939

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Jacob M. Zinaman for appellant.

James N. Gehrig and Jeremiah Wood for Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead et al., respondents.

Hartley G. Pelletier and Frank Hancock Hennessy for Franklin Society for Home Building and Savings, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Koeber v. Bedell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1939
21 N.E.2d 200 (N.Y. 1939)

upholding prohibition of reconstruction of nonconforming building after fire damaged it by more than seventy-five percent of its value

Summary of this case from Chioffi v. City of Winooski
Case details for

Matter of Koeber v. Bedell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PAUL C. KOEBER, Appellant, against STEPHEN A. BEDELL et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 18, 1939

Citations

21 N.E.2d 200 (N.Y. 1939)
21 N.E.2d 200

Citing Cases

Incorporated Village of N. Hornell v. Rauber

Plaintiff's counsel argues that the zoning ordinance specifies 75% of the assessed valuation, and that if…

Pelham v. Board of Trustees

The public interest preferring the elimination of nonconforming uses, having been postponed, ripens into…