From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Klenk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1914
165 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

November, 1914.


The husband and wife became joint tenants of the $14,000 deposited ( Kelly v. Beers, 194 N.Y. 49; Matter of Meehan, 59 App. Div. 156; Platt v. Grubb, 41 Hun, 447; Matter of Kaupper, 141 App. Div. 54; Kelly v. Home Savings Bank, 103 id. 141; Sanford v. Sanford, 45 N.Y. 723; McElroy v. Albany Savings Bank, 8 App. Div. 46), and the husband was not ousted from such tenancy by her withdrawal of the money and by the deposit of it elsewhere, or by loaning a part of it and receiving a note therefor. ( O'Connor v. Dunnigan, 158 App. Div. 334. ) The decree of the Surrogate's Court of Queens county should be reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to the surrogate to proceed in accordance with this opinion. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Decree of the Surrogate's Court of Queens county reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to said court to proceed in accordance with opinion.


Summaries of

Matter of Klenk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1914
165 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Matter of Klenk

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of FRITZ KLENK, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1914

Citations

165 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Citing Cases

Bruff v. Rochester Trust Safe Deposit Co.

The fact that it was deposited in the wife's name does not alone negative the existence of an agreement that…

Walsh v. Keenan

One joint tenant cannot be "ousted from such tenancy" by the act of the other in drawing out moneys. ( Matter…