From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kelly v. Board of Education of City of N.Y

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 31, 1932
182 N.E. 162 (N.Y. 1932)

Summary

In Matter of Kelly v. Board of Educ. of City of New York (234 A.D. 239) the Appellate Division of the first department stated that the petitioner was properly suspended for more than thirty days under the State Education Law even though a provision of the Charter of New York City limits suspension to a period of one month, by reason of the fact that the law which governs a particular body defines the limits of suspension.

Summary of this case from Matter of Cugell v. Monaghan

Opinion

Argued March 16, 1932

Decided March 31, 1932

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Arthur J.W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel ( J. Joseph Lilly, Henry J. Shields and Cornelius Bregoff of counsel), for appellant.

Austin B. Mandel for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ. Not sitting: KELLOGG, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Kelly v. Board of Education of City of N.Y

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 31, 1932
182 N.E. 162 (N.Y. 1932)

In Matter of Kelly v. Board of Educ. of City of New York (234 A.D. 239) the Appellate Division of the first department stated that the petitioner was properly suspended for more than thirty days under the State Education Law even though a provision of the Charter of New York City limits suspension to a period of one month, by reason of the fact that the law which governs a particular body defines the limits of suspension.

Summary of this case from Matter of Cugell v. Monaghan
Case details for

Matter of Kelly v. Board of Education of City of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH F. KELLY, Respondent, against THE BOARD OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 31, 1932

Citations

182 N.E. 162 (N.Y. 1932)
182 N.E. 162

Citing Cases

Sinicropi v. Bennett

Absent reinstatement, no claim for back pay could be honored even if the employee's dismissal had been…

Matter of Wolf v. Bd. of Educ., City of N.Y

While there is some reference to the power of the head of an agency to suspend an employee for one month, as…