From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Keith v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1995
220 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 5, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner's contentions, there is no requirement that a candidate at a primary election be a resident of the district at the time of the filing of the petitions nominating or designating him or her as a candidate in the primary. The only residency requirement is that the candidate be a resident at the time of the general election (see, Election Law § 6-122; Public Officers Law § 3; Westchester County Charter § 107.31; see also, Matter of Weidman v. Starkweather, 80 N.Y.2d 955, 956; Matter of Marino v. Board of Elections, 199 A.D.2d 505; Matter of Clark v. McCoy, 196 A.D.2d 607). Sullivan, J.P., Pizzuto, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Keith v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1995
220 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Keith v. King

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HERMAN KEITH, Appellant, v. LLOYD KING, JR., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 582

Citing Cases

In the Matter of William T. Biamonte v. Savinetti

Furthermore, contrary to the appellant's contention, the affidavits submitted by Jones, Kennedy, MacKenzie,…

In re William T. Biamonte

Furthermore, contrary to the appellant's contention, the affidavits submitted by Jones, Kennedy, MacKenzie,…