From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Jones v. New York City Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1993
198 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 1, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It appears from the record that the respondent New York City Housing Authority received knowledge of the facts of this matter within the time that a notice of claim was required to have been served, and was not prejudiced by the delay (see, Matter of Irizarry v New York City Hous. Auth., 167 A.D.2d 466). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in granting leave to file a late notice of claim. Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Ritter and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Jones v. New York City Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1993
198 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Jones v. New York City Hous. Auth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HATTIE JONES, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 789

Citing Cases

Matter of Resto v. City of New York

Where there is no prejudice, the court clearly has the discretion to grant leave to serve a late notice of…