From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of John P

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1999
265 A.D.2d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Summary

construing N.Y. Mental Hyg. Law §§ 9.01, 9.33 (McKinney 1996)

Summary of this case from Francis S. v. Stone

Opinion

Argued September 9, 1999

October 28, 1999

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.33 to retain a patient involuntarily admitted to a hospital, Creedmoor Psychiatric Center appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.).


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the petition is granted.

Contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, the patient, John P., is a person "in need of involuntary care and treatment" (Mental Hygiene Law § 9.01 ). In order to retain a patient in a hospital for involuntary psychiatric care, the hospital must establish by clear and convincing evidence that the patient is mentally ill and in need of further care and treatment, and that the patient poses a substantial threat of physical harm to himself or to others (Matter of Seltzer v. Grace J., 213 A.D.2d 412 ; Matter of Jeannette S., 157 A.D.2d 783, 783-784 ; Matter of Edward L., 137 A.D.2d 818 ).

Through testimony elicited at the hearing and through the patient's medical records, it was established that the patient is mentally ill, that he has serious difficulty maintaining control of his rage and anger, and that he was frequently violent and verbally abusive. He also harbors beliefs that he and his paramour would be reunited despite a protective order against him and her repeated efforts to inform him she would not reunite with him. It was also demonstrated that John P. was frequently abusive to himself, banging his head against walls and tables. Although the witnesses at the hearing disagreed as to whether John P. should remain in Creedmoor Psychiatric Center (hereinafter Creedmoor), they both agreed that he required a structured environment and medication on a structured schedule. There was, however, no evidence indicating that John P. would comply with his obligation to take the required medications.

On the basis of the record, including the testimony of the witnesses, Creedmoor established by clear and convincing evidence that John P. is mentally ill, is in need of further care and treatment, and poses a threat to himself and/or others. Thus, retention is warranted (see, Matter of George L., 85 N.Y.2d 295, 308).

THOMPSON, J.P., SULLIVAN, ALTMAN, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of John P

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1999
265 A.D.2d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

construing N.Y. Mental Hyg. Law §§ 9.01, 9.33 (McKinney 1996)

Summary of this case from Francis S. v. Stone

interpreting "in need of involuntary care and treatment" under the Mental Hygiene Law to mean "establish[ing] by clear and convincing evidence that the patient is mentally ill and in need of further care and treatment, and that the patient poses a substantial threat of physical harm to himself or to others"

Summary of this case from Francis S. v. Stone
Case details for

Matter of John P

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF JOHN P. (Anonymous), respondent; CREEDMOOR PSYCHIATRIC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 120

Citing Cases

Francis S. v. Stone

Involuntary civil commitment procedures mandate numerous protections, including a requirement that the party…

MP v. Ramesar

[emphasis added]. In re John P., 265 A.D.2d 559, 697 N.Y.S.2d 120 (2nd Dept. 1999) ; See also, Seltzer v.…