From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Jennifer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1990
163 A.D.2d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

July 13, 1990

Appeal from the Ontario County Family Court, Henry, J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.


Order affirmed without costs. All concur, Pine, J., not participating. Memorandum: There is no merit to appellant's contention that the court's finding of neglect and its decision to place the children with the County Department of Social Services were not supported by sufficient evidence. The record reveals that the children continuously lived in squalid conditions (e.g., maggot-infested couch; soiled diapers, feces and spoiled food on floor) and that the parents failed to clean their residence or to exercise minimal cleanliness (e.g., urine-soaked cribsheets, dry and hardened feces in diapers). Moreover, the parents refused to sign a contract with the Department of Social Services to clean their home and to put trash in a can instead of on the floor. Proof that the parents failed to provide basic cleanliness or adequate nourishment, particularly for the newborn, was sufficient to support a finding of physical impairment (see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]) and to warrant placement of the children.

The remaining contentions raised on appeal are without merit.


Summaries of

Matter of Jennifer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1990
163 A.D.2d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Jennifer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JENNIFER B. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 13, 1990

Citations

163 A.D.2d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
558 N.Y.S.2d 429

Citing Cases

People v. Perez

These allegations, when considered collectively, demonstrate that the defendant neglected her children to an…

Matter of Lillian

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The appellant argues that…