From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of J

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 26, 2001
281 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted February 27, 2001.

March 26, 2001.

In four proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law 384-b to terminate parental rights on the grounds of permanent neglect and that the mother is unable to care for the children as a result of mental retardation, the mother appeals from four orders of the Family Court, Kings County (Weinstein, J.), all dated September 29, 1999 (one in each proceeding), which, after a fact-finding hearing, terminated her parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the children to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and the petitioner St. Vincent's Services, Inc.

Miller Goldman, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Julie L. Miller of counsel), for appellant.

Magovern Sclafani, New York, N.Y. (Frederick J. Magovern and Meredith Levy of counsel), for respondent.

Monica Drinane, New York, N.Y. (Jeremy J. Best and Marcia Egger of counsel), Law Guardian for the children.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that the appellant is unable to care for the subject children as a result of mental retardation, resulting in fundamentally impaired judgment and an inability to provide adequately and properly for the subject children (see, Social Services Law 384-b[c]; Matter of Hime Y., 52 N.Y.2d 242). The court-appointed psychologist testified that based upon her examinations of the mother and her review of her medical records, the mother was suffering from mental retardation. The mother's condition is long-standing, and she possesses a history of poor judgment. Accordingly, the Family Court properly found that there was clear and convincing evidence that the mother presently and for the foreseeable future would be unable to care for the children by reason of mental retardation (see, Matter of Joyce T., 65 N.Y.2d 39).


Summaries of

Matter of J

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 26, 2001
281 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of J

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF SHANEEKA TYSHEEKA J. (ANONYMOUS). NADINE ANITA J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 26, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 258

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Lisa Marie S

At the hearing, the psychologist, whose testimony was unrefuted, indicated that the mother was mentally…

IN THE MATTER OF KARAN ANN B

The psychologist expressed his opinion that, because of the mother's condition, she would experience…