From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Innes v. Cosgrove

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 18, 1942
43 N.E.2d 89 (N.Y. 1942)

Opinion

Argued May 28, 1942

Decided June 18, 1942

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, NORTON, J.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Henry Epstein and William J. Butler of counsel), for appellant.

Abraham Shamos, Rudolph E. Uhlman and Peter F. Gulotta for Carl A. Richter, respondent.



Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Innes v. Cosgrove

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 18, 1942
43 N.E.2d 89 (N.Y. 1942)
Case details for

Matter of Innes v. Cosgrove

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANK H. INNES, as District Attorney of Richmond County…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 18, 1942

Citations

43 N.E.2d 89 (N.Y. 1942)
43 N.E.2d 89

Citing Cases

People v. Richter

There was considerable delay before that application was acted upon because the District Attorney challenged…

People v. Bishop

While it is true that in the case at bar an indictment was not handed down, the Grand Jury after examining…