From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hughes v. Wasik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 2, 1996

Appeal from the Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order of Family Court granting the application of petitioner mother for upward modification of child support from $60 per week, as established by the parties' 1979 separation agreement, to $178.93 pursuant to the Child Support Standards Act (CSSA). Respondent contends that the court erred in making a finding of fact contrary to an apparent finding of the Hearing Examiner and in increasing child support.

We conclude that the court properly made its own findings of fact pursuant to its authority to review the order of the Hearing Examiner (see, Family Ct Act § 439 [e] [ii]). We also conclude that Family Court properly found a basis for upward modification of child support based on the insufficiency of the prior support arrangement to meet the needs of the children (see, Matter of Brescia v. Fitts, 56 N.Y.2d 132; Matter of Barnes v. Barnes, 186 A.D.2d 1042; Matter of Sutton v. Sutton, 178 A.D.2d 980, 981). Petitioner demonstrated that the death of her husband, who had been helping to support respondent's children, and the increase in the food, clothing, medical, transportation, and educational needs of the children, have rendered her unable to meet the expenses of the household. Petitioner demonstrated modest needs of approximately $2,600 per month, and income, including Social Security survivors' benefits and imputed income from investment of life insurance proceeds, totaling only about $2,000 per month. The deficit has forced petitioner to borrow to pay for funeral and living expenses since her husband's death (see, Matter of Clate v. Clate, 199 A.D.2d 1064, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 756). Based on the proof of unmet needs, a de novo determination of respondent's child support obligation, in accordance with the CSSA, was warranted (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [l]; Matter of Tapp v. Tapp, 202 A.D.2d 679).


Summaries of

Matter of Hughes v. Wasik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Hughes v. Wasik

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SUSAN M. HUGHES, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE WASIK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 556

Citing Cases

T.M. v. J.K. (In re Proceeding for Support Under Article 4)

The outcome advocated by the father does not significantly vary from the outcome advocated by the mother.…

T.M. v. J.K.

The outcome advocated by the father does not significantly vary from the outcome advocated by the mother.…