Summary
In Hospers v. Hungerford Smith Co. (230 N.Y. 616) the employee resided at Sheldon, Iowa, and was employed as a traveling salesman for the employer which had its plant and principal place of business at Rochester, N.Y., where the employee was hired.
Summary of this case from Matter of Seely v. Phoenix Transit Co.Opinion
Argued January 11, 1921
Decided March 1, 1921
E.C. Sherwood, Clarence S. Zipp and Benjamin C. Loder for appellants.
Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.