From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Heeran v. Scully

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1930
254 N.Y. 344 (N.Y. 1930)

Summary

adding members to board created by city charter held to curtail power of existing members

Summary of this case from Mayor v. Council

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1930

Decided October 7, 1930

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

John J. Scully for appellants. Daniel J. Dugan and Isadore Bookstein for respondent.


A local law by which two members are added to a board theretofore consisting of three elective city officers has the effect of curtailing the power of such elective officers and becomes operative only after approval by the majority of the qualified electors of that city voting upon the proposition (City Home Rule Law; Cons. Laws, ch. 76, § 15, subd. 5.) A duty is imposed upon the city clerk with the advice of the corporation counsel to prepare an abstract of such local law and forthwith to transmit such proposition and such abstract to the designated election officers (Id. § 18). Such a duty may be enforced by mandamus upon the petition of a qualified elector of the city.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Heeran v. Scully

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1930
254 N.Y. 344 (N.Y. 1930)

adding members to board created by city charter held to curtail power of existing members

Summary of this case from Mayor v. Council
Case details for

Matter of Heeran v. Scully

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MATTHEW A. HEERAN, Respondent, against JOHN J. SCULLY, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 7, 1930

Citations

254 N.Y. 344 (N.Y. 1930)
173 N.E. 7

Citing Cases

Tomasino v. Inc. Vill. of Islandia (In re Suffolk Reg'l Off-Track Betting Corp.)

The cases cited by the Plaintiffs where the courts vacated laws that curtailed an elective official's…

Molinari v. Bloomberg

Given that the Appellate Division considered and rejected the same argument as that presented by petitioners…