From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hawthorne Dev. Associates v. Gribin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1987
128 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

March 30, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Beisner, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion to renew is granted, and, upon renewal, the order dated September 3, 1985 is vacated and the application to permanently stay arbitration is granted.

The respondents demanded arbitration after the petitioners terminated the employment of the respondent N.D. Gribin Company as the exclusive sales and marketing agent for the petitioners' condominium project. In an order dated September 3, 1985 (Beisner, J.), the court denied the petitioners' application for a stay of arbitration, finding that the arbitration clauses in the subject agreements were broad enough to encompass the respondents' claims for damages for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty. Subsequently, during that same month of September, the respondents commenced an action in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, against the petitioners seeking, among other relief, damages related to the termination of N.D. Gribin Company's employment. Six causes of action were alleged in the complaint. Causes of action two through five encompass tort claims against parties who did not sign the subject agreements and cannot be compelled to submit to arbitration. Causes of action one and six allege, respectively, conspiracy to defraud and prima facie tort related to the decision by the petitioners to terminate the respondent N.D. Gribin Company as exclusive sales agent and substitute another company. Although labeled differently, these two causes of action encompass the breach of contract issues raised in the arbitration proceeding.

Arbitration is a contractual right that can be waived (Sherrill v. Grayco Bldrs., 64 N.Y.2d 261, 272). We find that, by having commenced an action at law involving arbitrable issues, the respondents waived their right to arbitration, and the petitioners are entitled to a permanent stay of the arbitration proceeding (see, Matter of United Paper Mach. Corp. [Di Carlo], 19 A.D.2d 143, affd 14 N.Y.2d 814). Mollen, P.J., Weinstein, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Hawthorne Dev. Associates v. Gribin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1987
128 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Hawthorne Dev. Associates v. Gribin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HAWTHORNE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES et al., Appellants, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1987

Citations

128 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Tengtu International Corp. v. Cheung

In any event, as correctly pointed out by Tengtu, it is the affirmative use of the judicial process to…

Rosenfeld v. Langer

It is well settled that the commencement of an action at law involving arbitrable issues constitutes a waiver…