From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hartmann

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 16, 1995
667 A.2d 669 (N.J. 1995)

Opinion

November 16, 1995.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having on September 19, 1995, filed with the Court its decision concluding that JOHN A. HARTMANN, III, of PRINCETON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.4(c) (knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal), RPC 3.5(c) (engaging in conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal) and RPC 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN A. HARTMANN, III, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

Matter of Hartmann

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 16, 1995
667 A.2d 669 (N.J. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Hartmann

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOHN A. HARTMANN, III, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 16, 1995

Citations

667 A.2d 669 (N.J. 1995)
667 A.2d 669

Citing Cases

In re Vgllbrecht

factors considered were the attorney's financial problems, his battle with depression and significant family…

In re Pribula

mes defiantly) and with the disciplinary special master's direction not to contact a judge; the attorney also…