From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanslmaier v. Wehr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 16, 1993
199 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 16, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Sullivan County (Williams, J.).


On September 23, 1991, petitioner signed a resignation letter terminating his employment with the Sullivan County Department of Public Works. Petitioner's attorneys requested retraction of the resignation by letter dated November 7, 1991. Respondent denied the request by letter dated November 13, 1991. On March 12, 1992, this proceeding was commenced.

CPLR 217 (1) provides for a four-month Statute of Limitations to run from the time "the determination to be reviewed becomes final and binding upon the petitioner". The requested retraction and denial thereof did not extend the time to commence the proceeding (see, Matter of Williamson v Fermoile, 31 A.D.2d 438, affd 26 N.Y.2d 731). Petitioner fails to demonstrate that any hearing or administrative reconsideration of his resignation was required. Petitioner's cause of action accrued on September 23, 1991, the date of his resignation, and his petition is untimely. It is therefore unnecessary to consider petitioner's other contentions.

Weiss, P.J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr. and Crew III, JJ. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Hanslmaier v. Wehr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 16, 1993
199 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Hanslmaier v. Wehr

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHARLES HANSLMAIER, Appellant, v. ROGER W. WEHR, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 436

Citing Cases

Reo v. Vill. of Lawrence

The Supreme Court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. The petitioner's challenges to the…

Mtr. of Lewis v. State

However, the Supreme Court properly dismissed as untimely the claims relating to the petitioner's…