Opinion
Argued October 31, 1917
Decided November 1, 1917
Norbert Blank for appellant.
Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel ( Terence Farley of counsel), for respondents.
Order affirmed, with costs, on authority of Matter of Richards ( 221 N.Y. 684).
Concur: COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Concurs in result: HISCOCK, Ch. J. Dissenting on the ground that so far as section 122 of the Election Law requires more than 1,500 signatures for an independent nomination in a subdivision of a county or a borough, it is unreasonable and void: POUND, J.