From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Greenspon v. Stichman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 4, 1963
190 N.E.2d 421 (N.Y. 1963)

Summary

In Matter of Greenspon v Stichman (12 N.Y.2d 1079), we rejected a challenge to an investigation under the section of "the relationship between misconduct or corruption in office by public officials and the faithful execution of the laws by units of government in the State".

Summary of this case from Friedman v. Hi-Li Manor

Opinion

Argued March 25, 1963

Decided April 4, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, EDGAR J. NATHAN, JR., J.

Wyllys S. Newcomb, Stanley Godofsky and Leslie Srager for appellants.

Herman T. Stichman, in person, and Arnold G. Fraiman, Richard M. Palmer, Lawrence P.J. Bonaguidi and William G. Dakin for Herman T. Stichman, respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.


Summaries of

Matter of Greenspon v. Stichman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 4, 1963
190 N.E.2d 421 (N.Y. 1963)

In Matter of Greenspon v Stichman (12 N.Y.2d 1079), we rejected a challenge to an investigation under the section of "the relationship between misconduct or corruption in office by public officials and the faithful execution of the laws by units of government in the State".

Summary of this case from Friedman v. Hi-Li Manor
Case details for

Matter of Greenspon v. Stichman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HERBERT M. GREENSPON et al., Appellants, v. HERMAN T…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 4, 1963

Citations

190 N.E.2d 421 (N.Y. 1963)
190 N.E.2d 421
240 N.Y.S.2d 28

Citing Cases

Friedman v. Hi-Li Manor

In Matter of Di Brizzi (Proskauer) ( 303 N.Y. 206), our court held that recourse to the section could be had…

Matter of Greenspon v. Stichman

Decided May 2, 1963 Appeal from ( 12 N.Y.2d 1079) MOTIONS TO AMEND…