From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gonkjur Associates v. Abrams

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 12, 1982
57 N.Y.2d 853 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Argued September 8, 1982

Decided October 12, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, SOLOMON KATZ, J.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Robert Hermann and Gerald J. Hurwitz of counsel), appellant pro se. Steven R. Lapidus and Stanford M. Singer for respondent.

Kent Karlsson for One Plaza Street Tenant Association, amicus curiae.



MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice MAX BLOOM. Because the order appealed from finally determined the proceeding, we do not answer the certified question (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], pp 357-358).

We have not previously passed upon the construction of a statute requiring, as did subdivision 2 of section 352-e of the General Business Law, at the time here relevant, that a public official act "not later than thirty days after * * * filing." We add to Justice BLOOM'S decision, therefore, that although the phrase "not later than" may, when viewed against the remedial objectives of the statute in which the phrase appears, be construed to be directory only ( Usery v Whitin Mach. Works, 554 F.2d 498, 501-502; United States v Morris, 252 F.2d 643, 648-649), where, as here, the Attorney-General is not foreclosed by filing from further action protective of the public interests and the purpose of the time limitation is to protect the property owner against unreasonable delay, the statute is properly construed to be mandatory, rather than directory (see Matter of Whalen v Lefkowitz, 36 N.Y.2d 75, 78).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur; Judge GABRIELLI taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Question certified not answered as unnecessary.


Summaries of

Matter of Gonkjur Associates v. Abrams

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 12, 1982
57 N.Y.2d 853 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Gonkjur Associates v. Abrams

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GONKJUR ASSOCIATES, Respondent, v. ROBERT ABRAMS, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 12, 1982

Citations

57 N.Y.2d 853 (N.Y. 1982)
455 N.Y.S.2d 761
442 N.E.2d 58

Citing Cases

Pepin v. NYC Dep't of Educ.

Such a procedure in turn requires at least a response to a request for the certificate. Gonkjur Assoc. v.…

Pepin v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

Such a procedure in turn requires at least a response to a request for the certificate. Gonkjur Assoc. v.…