Opinion
Argued October 29, 1942
Decided December 3, 1942
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, JOHNSON, J.
William B. Roulstone and Adam Frank for appellant.
William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel ( James Hall Prothero, Paxton Blair and Rose Schneph of counsel), for respondents.
Order affirmed, with costs. There is evidence sufficient to support the findings that the structure in question was not an "amusement device" within the meaning of the Administrative Code. We pass upon no other question. No opinion.
Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J. LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.