From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Glen Cove Community Development Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 1999
259 A.D.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 29, 1999

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.


After a public hearing, the respondent, Glen Cove Community Development Agency (hereinafter the Agency), adopted a resolution to condemn the petitioner's property. The property consists of a three-story glass-and-brick enclosed shopping mall located on five lots in the central business district of the City of Glen Cove. The petitioner, who purchased the property shortly before the public hearing, planned to convert the mall into a catering hall/restaurant.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the Agency established that the proposed condemnation will serve a valid public purpose. The hearing transcript is replete with references to economic stagnation caused by persistent vacancies in the retail stores and restaurants in the central business district. In addition, several witnesses described the deteriorating physical condition of the buildings in the area, including the shopping mall. Those witnesses agreed that a local department store, which was interested in purchasing the shopping mall, would attract other businesses, revitalize the neighborhood and strengthen the City's economic base.

Under these circumstances, it cannot be said that the Agency acted in bad faith or that its determination to condemn the property for the purpose of selling it to the department store was irrational ( see, Village Auto Body Works v. Incorporated Vil. of Westbury, 90 A.D.2d 502; Matter of Dowling Coll. v. Flacke, 78 A.D.2d 551, 552). Moreover, the mere fact that the condemned property will be sold to a private entity to effectuate the redevelopment does not destroy the public benefit or invalidate the condemnor's determination as long as the public purpose is dominant ( see, Matter of Waldo's, Inc. v. Village of Johnson City, 74 N.Y.2d 718, 721; Cannata v. City of New York, 11 N.Y.2d 210).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Glen Cove Community Development Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 1999
259 A.D.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

In re Glen Cove Community Development Agency

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GLEN COVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 29, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 306

Citing Cases

Vitucci v. New York City School Const

an alternate use upon the discontinuation of the original planned public purpose. The terms "public use" or…

Matter of Three P. v. Town of East Hampton

The petitioner's property was to be acquired for the purposes, inter alia, of creating access between an…