From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Genesee Hospital v. St. Div. of Human Rights

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1980
50 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued May 1, 1980

Decided June 12, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department.

Robert E. Ganz, Harry Starr, Ann Thacher Anderson and Joseph B. Robison for appellants.

Susan S. Robfogel for respondent.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Shirley Adelson Siegel, Judith T. Kramer and Stefan Presser of counsel), intervenor pro se.



Order reversed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice RICHARD D. SIMONS at the Appellate Division insofar as it relates to the finding of discrimination ( 68 A.D.2d 692, 701-704; see, also, Matter of Schweitzer Aircraft Corp. v State Div. of Human Rights, 48 N.Y.2d 294) ; and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, with directions to remand to the State Division of Human Rights for consideration of the affirmative action directed in its order in light of present circumstances, as we do not pass on the affirmative relief directed.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Matter of Genesee Hospital v. St. Div. of Human Rights

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1980
50 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Matter of Genesee Hospital v. St. Div. of Human Rights

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GENESEE HOSPITAL, Respondent, v. STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 12, 1980

Citations

50 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. 1980)
431 N.Y.S.2d 523
409 N.E.2d 995

Citing Cases

State Division of Human Rights v. Rochester Housing Authority

The revised policy does not, therefore, violate the statute, a conclusion with which complainant agreed on…

State Div. of Human Rights v. Carnation Co.

The commissioner found that Carnation Company "did not sustain the burden of proof required by section…