rejecting claim that regulation forbidding performance of "any major surgical procedure except by "a duly qualified surgeon" and "except in matters of dire emergency" was unconstitutionally vague. The Court noted, in particular, that those affected by the rule — physicians, surgeons and hospitals — "undoubtedly" generally understood these terms
Summary of this case from In re Polk License RevocationMay 17, 1977.
Petition for certification denied. (See 147 N.J. Super. 592)
rejecting claim that regulation forbidding performance of "any major surgical procedure except by "a duly qualified surgeon" and "except in matters of dire emergency" was unconstitutionally vague. The Court noted, in particular, that those affected by the rule — physicians, surgeons and hospitals — "undoubtedly" generally understood these terms
Summary of this case from In re Polk License RevocationFull title:IN THE MATTER OF GARDEN STATE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date published: May 17, 1977
den. sub nom., In the Matter of Garden State Community Hospital, 74 N.J. 283 (1977) (rejecting claim that…