From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Furstenberg, Aetna Cas. Sur. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1980
49 N.Y.2d 757 (N.Y. 1980)

Summary

stating that an insurer “was obliged under the statute to accept the arbitral forum for the resolution of the claim against it”

Summary of this case from Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Five Boro Psychological Servs., P.C.

Opinion

Argued January 9, 1980

Decided February 7, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, HILDA G. SCHWARTZ, J.

Abraham L. Shapiro and Gerald Richman for appellant.

Ignatius John Melito, J. Robert Morris and Steven Di Joseph for Aetna Casualty Surety Co., respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court confirming the arbitration award reinstated.

Recognizing that Aetna Casualty Surety Co. was obliged under the statute to accept the arbitral forum for the resolution of the claim against it, we agree that the standard for judicial review of the award is more exacting than in voluntary arbitration (cf. Mount St. Mary's Hosp. of Niagara Falls v Catherwood, 26 N.Y.2d 493). We conclude, however, that it was error on the part of the Appellate Division to set this award aside.

It is not suggested that the award was not made in good faith or was without basis in the evidence submitted to the arbitrator. Nor is there any intimation of trespass of constitutional rights or violation of strong public policy. To the extent that it is pertinent it cannot be seriously contended that there was not a rational basis for the award or that the award was not otherwise grounded in reason. In these circumstances we are not prepared, in the disposition of this appeal, to hold as a matter of law that the award must be set aside because it may be said that the Appellate Division in cases subsequently considered by it reached a different result with respect to the effectiveness of similarly defective notices of termination.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Furstenberg, Aetna Cas. Sur. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1980
49 N.Y.2d 757 (N.Y. 1980)

stating that an insurer “was obliged under the statute to accept the arbitral forum for the resolution of the claim against it”

Summary of this case from Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Five Boro Psychological Servs., P.C.

stating that insurer “was obliged under the statute to accept the arbitral forum for the resolution of the claim against it”

Summary of this case from Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Excel Imaging, P.C.
Case details for

Matter of Furstenberg, Aetna Cas. Sur. Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between ALBERT FURSTENBERG, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 7, 1980

Citations

49 N.Y.2d 757 (N.Y. 1980)
426 N.Y.S.2d 465
403 N.E.2d 170

Citing Cases

Shand

This appeal confronts us with an opportunity to attempt definition of the standard to be applied when…

Metro. Radiological v. Country-Wide Ins.

In Matter of Furstenberg (Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. — Allstate Ins. Co.) ( 49 NY2d 757), cited by the Shand court,…