From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Frick v. Bahou

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 18, 1982
56 N.Y.2d 777 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided May 18, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, LAWRENCE E. KAHN, J.

Ralph W. Fusco for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( John Q. Driscoll of counsel), for respondents.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, without costs, and judgment of Special Term reinstated. Respondents' grading of the examination was in contravention of the respondent commission's own rules and regulations (4 N.Y.CRR 66.1) . The rules of an administrative agency, duly promulgated, are binding upon the agency as well as upon any other person who might be affected (see People ex rel. Doscher v Sisson, 222 N.Y. 387, 393-394).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Matter of Frick v. Bahou

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 18, 1982
56 N.Y.2d 777 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Frick v. Bahou

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BARBARA H. FRICK, Appellant, v. VICTOR S. BAHOU, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 18, 1982

Citations

56 N.Y.2d 777 (N.Y. 1982)
452 N.Y.S.2d 18
437 N.E.2d 277

Citing Cases

Markowitz v. Serio

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City ( Drake Colley, Edward F.X. Hart, Alan H. Kleinman and…

Wile v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

"Tt is well settled that a court may not substitute its judgment for that of the board or body it reviews…