Summary
In Matter of Freudenfeld v. Stein Co. (271 N.Y. 548), relied upon by the appellants, the claimant was injured while going from his home to New York city. On conflicting testimony as to where he planned to go upon arriving in New York city, the Industrial Board made findings that he was not within the course of his employment at the time of the accident, and since there was some evidence to support such findings, the Appellate Division and this court affirmed.
Summary of this case from Matter of Bennett v. Marine Works, Inc.Opinion
Argued April 15, 1936
Decided May 1, 1936
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
Abraham Markhoff for appellant.
Herbert F. Hastings, Jr., and A.F. Klaiber for Louis Stein Co., Inc., et al., respondents.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.