From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Franklin Mint Corporation v. Tully

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 980 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Decided March 22, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Lisa D. Filloramo, P.J. Di Quinzio and Joseph D. Holston, Jr., for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Peter H. Schiff and Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), for respondents.



On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 94 A.D.2d 877).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Matter of Franklin Mint Corporation v. Tully

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 980 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Franklin Mint Corporation v. Tully

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANKLIN MINT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. JAMES H. TULLY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 22, 1984

Citations

61 N.Y.2d 980 (N.Y. 1984)
475 N.Y.S.2d 280
463 N.E.2d 621

Citing Cases

SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. Bannon

In Cooey-Bentz Co. v. Lindley, 66 Ohio St.2d 54, 419 N.E.2d 1087 (1981), the court cited advertising directed…

S. H. B. Super Markets, Inc. v. Chu

The Tax Commission concluded that by reason of the substantial discrepancy between the amount of tax reported…