From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Franck v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 8, 1946
270 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Summary

In Franck v. Allen, 270 App. Div. 960, 61 N.Y.S.2d 728, a farmhand, sweeping the floor of the cowbarn discovered a dynamite cap. He inserted a nail in the cap with the result that the powder exploded causing injuries.

Summary of this case from Boyd v. Florida Mattress Factory, Inc.

Opinion

May 8, 1946.


Appeal by an employer and insurance carrier from an award in claimant's favor. Claimant was employed as a farm hand. On April 9, 1942, he was sweeping up the floor of the cow barn. He noticed an oblong shell-like object on the floor of the barn and he picked it up. It proved to be a dynamite cap. He attempted to remove the powder by knocking the shell but did not succeed. He then picked up a nail from a window sill, inserted it in the cap with the result that the powder exploded and claimant suffered injuries. The board found that claimant's injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment. The evidence sustains that finding. ( Matter of Pedersen v. Nelson, 267 App. Div. 843; Matter of Derby v. International Salt Co., Inc., 233 App. Div. 15; Matter of Miles v. Gibbs Hall, Inc., 250 N.Y. 590; Matter of Richards v. Creamer, 267 App. Div. 928; Matter of Van Buren v. Vener Trucking Corp., 258 App. Div. 1016.) Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board. All concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Franck v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 8, 1946
270 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

In Franck v. Allen, 270 App. Div. 960, 61 N.Y.S.2d 728, a farmhand, sweeping the floor of the cowbarn discovered a dynamite cap. He inserted a nail in the cap with the result that the powder exploded causing injuries.

Summary of this case from Boyd v. Florida Mattress Factory, Inc.
Case details for

Matter of Franck v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of WILLIAM FRANCK, Respondent, against A.W…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 8, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Secor v. Penn Service Garage

In sustaining an award to the employee the court pointed out that the employment was "at least in part"…

Matter of Slater v. Pilch

Here, since the facts are undisputed the question is one of law ( Matter of Martin v. Plaut, 293 N.Y. 617,…