From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Fortuna v. Murdock

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1939
24 N.E.2d 21 (N.Y. 1939)

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1939

Decided October 30, 1939

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, FURMAN, J.

William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel ( Paxton Blair of counsel), for Board of Standards and Appeals, appellant.

Archie H. Samuels for Morris Roth, intervener, appellant.

Samuel Gellman for respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ. Taking no part: O'BRIEN, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Fortuna v. Murdock

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1939
24 N.E.2d 21 (N.Y. 1939)
Case details for

Matter of Fortuna v. Murdock

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of VITO FORTUNA, Respondent, against HARRIS H. MURDOCK et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 30, 1939

Citations

24 N.E.2d 21 (N.Y. 1939)
24 N.E.2d 21

Citing Cases

Crossroads Recreation, Inc. v. Broz

(See People ex rel. Werner v. Walsh, 212 App. Div. 635, 640, affd. 240 N.Y. 689; Franklin v. Incorporated…

440 East 102nd Street Corp. v. Murdock

The important feature of this decision is that it took into consideration the entire structural change…