From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Forlenza v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1998
256 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 14, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

Because the hearing which preceded the determination under review was not held pursuant to direction by law (see, Retirement and Social Security Law § 803 Retire. Soc. Sec. [b] [3]), the issue presented on this appeal is whether the determination was affected by error of law, arbitrary and capricious, or an abuse of discretion (see, CPLR 7803; Matter of Colton v. Berman, 21 N.Y.2d 322, 329; Matter of Bevacqua v. Sobol, 176 A.D.2d 1, 3). Under the circumstances of this case, where the Hearing Officer concluded that the petitioner was not entirely credible in her testimony regarding whether or not she was informed of the option to join the retirement system when she began her employment with the Uniondale Union Free School District (hereinafter the District), the Supreme Court erred in finding that the District's determination was arbitrary and capricious (see, Retirement and Social Security Law § 803 Retire. Soc. Sec.; Matter of Tompkins v. Board of Educ., 245 A.D.2d 522; Matter of Chupka v. Board of Educ., 240 A.D.2d 795; see also, Matter of Scanlan v. Buffalo Pub. School Sys., 90 N.Y.2d 662). Accordingly, the judgment must be reversed and the proceeding dismissed.

Copertino, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Forlenza v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1998
256 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Forlenza v. Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RITA FORLENZA, Respondent, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 575

Citing Cases

Nyc Health + Hosps. v. Org. Analysts

Initially, the court notes that the hearing that preceded the determination under review was discretionary…

Matter of White v. Freyman [2d Dept 1999

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the determination of the Hearing Officer, the…